15 August 2018News

Reinsurers align third-party capital with their needs

Reinsurers have embraced third-party capital through instruments like sidecars, collateralized reinsurance, and catastrophe bonds and the retrocession market increasingly depends on this convergence capital, a new report by S&P Global Ratings states.

Insurance-linked securitization (ILS), which brings third-party capital into the reinsurance sector, has transformed the market, especially in the property catastrophe space, S&P says in the report called "How Reinsurers Have Learned To Align Third-Party Capital With Their Needs”.

Even after severe natural catastrophe events in 2017 caused $138 billion in insured losses globally, there was more than enough inflow of alternative capital to renew coverage for cedants on Jan. 1, 2018. This had, however, the effect of limiting the price hikes that would traditionally have followed such severe losses and reinsurers had been hoping for.

The latest figures show that ILS funds had combined assets under management of nearly $100 billion by July 2018. Even as the reinsurance industry digested the effects of 2017's three major hurricanes--Harvey, Irma, and Maria, which affected the Caribbean Islands, Texas, and Florida--alternative capital continued to grow, contrary to the expectations of some market observers. Investors, scenting the chance of increased returns, replaced capital that had been put aside as collateral to cover insured losses, enabling them to participate in the Jan. 1, 2018, round of renewals. As a result, the price hikes the industry has typically seen after previous catastrophe events were limited.

Many observers had assumed that investors who entered the ILS market during the recent string of benign catastrophe years might take fright when investment returns turned negative. However, S&P saw no capital flight following the negative investment returns that followed the 2017 hurricanes as losses were within investors' expectations. Indeed, the market was able to more than restore the collateral trapped following the 2017 events.

Overall, the use of collateralized reinsurance, sidecars, and catastrophe bonds has helped the reinsurance industry to increase its premiums while maintaining its net exposures, S&P noted. Collateralized reinsurance will continue to represent the majority of convergence capital.

Having conquered the property catastrophe business, S&P continues to see alternative capital testing products in new areas, such as casualty or life reinsurance. The increased complexity and longer tail of products in these sectors have yet to strike a chord with investors, however, the report notes.

Get all the latest re/insurance industry news with our daily newsletter -  sign up here.

More of today's news

Aspen grants CFO $2m retention award

Lloyd’s agencies eager to embrace ILS

Fosun vice president becomes Peak Re chairman

Admiral CEO pleased with UK motor as H1 profits rise

IAG grows insurance profit by 11% in 2018 FY

Capsicum Re boosts cyber division

Don't miss our insurtech email newsletter - sign up today

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Elliot Field at efield@newtonmedia.co.uk or Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Alternative Risk Transfer
20 August 2018   The chairman of the CATCo Reinsurance Opportunities Fund is expecting further rate decreases in the January 2019 renewals following challenging 2018 renewals.
Insurance
8 August 2018   S&P Global Ratings has placed the 'A-' ratings of Swiss Re ReAssure (SRRAL) on Credit Watch Negative, following the announcement by its parent Swiss Re Group that it is exploring the possibility of an initial public offering (IPO) of the UK closed-book consolidator ReAssure (not rated).
Insurance
26 July 2018   The natural catastrophe losses of 2017 revealed some “surprising” disparities in reinsurers' exposures and their estimated return periods, according to a new report by S&P called ‘Are Global Reinsurers Ready For Another Year Of Active Natural Catastrophes?’