Earnings volatility concerns drive reinsurance buying
Reinsurance is used increasingly for earnings protection and volatility reduction by insurers whose purchasing is guided by “risk appetite statements” deployed to optimize capital management and profitability targets, according to a survey of insurers by Willis Towers Watson.
Eighty percent of insurers consider their risk appetite statements when defining their reinsurance strategies, according to the Global Reinsurance and Risk Appetite Survey Report 2017/2018.
Due to pressure from investors, insurers are becoming less tolerant of missed earnings targets. As a result, they are moving to more sophisticated metrics, such as return on equity and economic capital, the broker said.
Of 260 insurers from 51 countries surveyed, 98 percent have adopted a formal risk appetite, or intend to within three years. Respondents’ enterprise risk management capabilities have improved, but more progress is needed to achieve companies’ risk-culture goals. Meanwhile, most respondents said that cyber is their main risk concern, due largely to difficulties in defining and managing cyber both from the underwriting and operational perspectives.
“Managing the volatility of underwriting results is of prime importance to insurers, and reinsurance strategy measured by risk appetite is key to that,” says James Kent, global CEO Willis Re. “This is particularly relevant for public companies where perceived volatility can severely impact share price, but also a wider range of insurers are now much more likely to consider a broad range of consolidated earnings metrics when assessing the impact of reinsurance. Our survey shows that the number of non-life insurers using rate of return on equity as their primary earnings metric has doubled in the past two years. This is in line with what we are currently experiencing in the field when realigning reinsurance programs to insurers’ strategies.”
Alice Underwood, global leader, insurance consulting and technology, added: “Changes to the global regulatory environment have increased the emphasis on capital measures and targets.
“Although regulatory capital is still the most relevant capital measure, economic and catastrophe risk capital are gaining momentum. The use of internal capital models increased substantially from a third to more than half of insurers between 2015 and 2017,” Underwood noted.
Make sure you are GDPR compliant and confirm your email address to keep getting our daily emails
More of today's news
MGAA may enlarge membership to embrace insurtechs, says body’s chair Manchester
Travelers unveils standalone cyber insurance in UK, Ireland
More than 100 die in record floods in Japan
MS Amlin strengthens European war business with Aon hire
Horseshoe appoints new London head from MS Amlin for ILS boost
Already registered?
Login to your account
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Elliot Field at efield@newtonmedia.co.uk or Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk
Editor's picks
Editor's picks
More articles
Copyright © intelligentinsurer.com 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze