Swiss Re, Allianz, Chubb inch closer to finalising unresolved Covid-19 BI issues
A second test case launched by the Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) has commenced in the Federal Court of Australia, marking a significant step in providing both the insurers and policyholders clarity and certainty on a number of key issues relating to pandemic coverage in business interruption policies.
The hearing is scheduled to run until 15 September, and will determine the meaning of policy wordings around disease definition, Covid-19 outbreak proximity, the impact of government mandates, and other policy wording matters.
Insurers represented in the second test case are Allianz, IAG, Chubb, Guild, and Swiss Re Corporate Solutions. However, all Insurance Council members have committed to applying the rulings of the courts in this and the first business interruption test case in a consistent way when assessing business interruption claims.
The second test case consists of nine small business claims from a range of business sectors and locations lodged with Australian Financial Complaints Authority as part of its dispute resolution process.
At the same time, the Federal Court will hear a separate case brought by QBE regarding the interpretation of Victorian property legislation, which has the potential to impact business interruption policies written under Victorian law.
The industry will meet the costs of policyholders in the second test case, as it did in the first test case.
ICA chief executive Andrew Hall (pictured), said: "The commencement of the second business interruption test case hearing is an important step towards finalising this issue and providing an efficient, transparent, and consistent framework to process business interruption claims."
"Insurers acknowledge the frustrations of policyholders who have been waiting to have claims resolved, however the unprecedented nature of this pandemic has meant court determinations have been necessary to establish the principles insurers need to process claims and resolve disputes," he added. "Insurers have taken a number of steps to ensure these claims will be prioritised when final rulings are made."
Did you get value from this story? Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories like this sent straight to your inbox.
Already registered?
Login to your account
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Elliot Field at efield@newtonmedia.co.uk or Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk
Editor's picks
Editor's picks
More articles
Copyright © intelligentinsurer.com 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze