23 August 2016Insurance

Solvency II regulations bad for business, warns RAA

Solvency II regulations could have negative consequences for US insurers and reinsurers, the Reinsurance Association of America (RAA) has warned in a Ways and Means Committee letter to Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew and US Trade Representative (USTR) Michael Froman.

The letter, written by committee chairman Kevin Brady and Ranking Member Sander Levin, urges the Treasury and USTR to address the European Union’s discriminatory practices against US re/insurers as they continue covered agreement negotiations.

“The negotiations also provide an important opportunity to end the uncertainty and potentially significant business losses faced by US insurers because of the EU’s discriminatory treatment,” the letter stated.

Frank Nutter, president of the Reinsurance Association of America, said: “Without a successful conclusion to the covered agreement negotiations, US insurers and reinsurers will be at a competitive disadvantage doing business in the European Union, facing onerous regulatory discrimination that inhibits access to markets.

“We look forward to working with Congress, the Federal Insurance Office and the US Trade Representative to bring these negotiations to a timely conclusion and one that is mutually satisfactory to all parties.”

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Elliot Field at efield@newtonmedia.co.uk or Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Insurance
23 August 2016   Solvency II ratios declined in the first half of 2016 across the UK life insurance sector, driven by a fall in interest rates, particularly following Britain’s decision to leave the EU, according to Fitch Ratings.
Insurance
18 July 2016   Rushed changes to the ultimate forward rate (UFR) could risk pushing insurers towards sub-optimal investment strategies, which could unnecessarily impact policyholders’ returns negatively, according to Insurance Europe, the European insurance and reinsurance federation.