No-deal Brexit could leave EU insurers in limbo: O’Connell
Brexit could yet cause insurers and reinsurers in the UK and the EU a number of problems including a drain of talent and intellectual property from London, and firms ending up in limbo, in the increasingly likely case of the UK’s leaving the EU without a deal.
That is according to Clive O’Connell, partner and head of insurance and reinsurance at McCarthy Denning, who told Monte Carlo Today that while most UK re/insurers have made contingency plans for Brexit, usually by forming a subsidiary in an EU country, many EU-based players have not.
There are more than 700 European re/insurers doing business in the UK using the passporting arrangement. Ideally, such companies would work with the Prudential Regulatory Authority (PRA) to use Part VII of the Financial Services and Markets Act (FSMA) insurance business transfers to establish a UK subsidiary.
That process takes three years on average and many did not start the process, instead hoping for a deal between the UK and the EU.
In March, the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) agreed Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs) with the Bank of England and PRA that basically agreed to honour the status of such companies for two years in the event of a no-deal Brexit.
O’Connell points out that this still causes a big issue for these companies given the PRA’s turnaround time on the authorisation of new subsidiaries and Part VIIs.
“Most UK re/insurers are prepared for the worst and have formed European hubs but the same has not happened the other way around,” he said.
“There are a large number of European companies operating here under passporting arrangements. If all those companies struggle to get authorised, that could cause a capacity issue in the market.”
He added that, depending on the outcome of a deal and future regulatory requirements, some UK reinsurers could also end up in a position where they are required to post collateral when working with cedants in regions including the EU, the US and Japan.
This could become a big talking point later in the renewals, he said, if a no-deal Brexit becomes a reality.
“We could see European insurers rejecting UK security without collateral, although it will not happen the other way around as the Bank of England has said it will respect European reinsurers’ security,” he explained.
O’Connell added that London risked losing talent and intellectual property as re/insurers that now have hubs in Europe may choose to use them as launchpads for new products and innovations—rather than London.
“They need good people on the ground making decisions in these offices and that will inevitably gain momentum over time. It would be a shame for London but that is a real risk in years to come,” he concluded.
Already registered?
Login to your account
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Elliot Field at efield@newtonmedia.co.uk or Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk
Editor's picks
Editor's picks
More articles
Copyright © intelligentinsurer.com 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze