'Disappointed' ICA reacts to rejected BI test case appeal
The Australian High Court has denied the Insurance Council of Australia's (ICA's) special leave to appeal on the interpretation of pandemic exclusions in some business interruption (BI) policies.
The court initially indicated that arguments will be heard on the application for special leave to appeal the NSW Court of Appeal’s judgment in the first business interruption test case.
ICA said the vast majority of claims will not be able to be finalised until further clarity is provided by the second test case. Meanwhile, insurers will respond to affected customers who have lodged business interruption claims on a case-by case basis.
Insurers commenced a second test case in the Federal Court of Australia in February 2021 to test the application of further issues of pandemic coverage in business interruption policies.
The second test case, which is anticipated to take place in late August 2021, will determine the meaning of policy wordings in relation to the definition of a disease, proximity of an outbreak to a business, and prevention of access to premises due to a government mandate, as well as policies that contain a hybrid of these type of wordings.
The industry will meet the costs of policyholders in the second test case, as it did in the first test case and will for any appeal.
ICA noted that policyholders should contact their broker or insurer directly if they require clarity on their particular circumstances and should gather and keep any evidence and documents to support any potential claim they may make.
Andrew Hall, chief executive of the Insurance Council of Australia, said: "While we are disappointed, this decision on the first test case provides us with certainty and allows the industry to focus on the issues to be resolved through the second test case underway in the Federal Court of Australia.
"We encourage policy holders who are considering lodging a claim to contact their broker or insurer, and make sure they are keeping all the necessary paperwork. Once finalised, insurers are committed to applying the courts’ decisions in both test cases in an efficient, transparent, and consistent way when assessing claims."
Did you get value from this story? Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories like this sent straight to your inbox.
Already registered?
Login to your account
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Elliot Field at efield@newtonmedia.co.uk or Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk
Editor's picks
Editor's picks
More articles
Copyright © intelligentinsurer.com 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze