Primary insurers to bear brunt of California fires: KBW
Primary insurers rather than reinsurers will bear the majority of losses produced by the wildfires that are currently scorching parts of California, according to KBW analyst Meyer Shields.
Fires in California have forced around 250,000 people to evacuate their homes and includes what is dubbed the most destructive fire in California state history. At least 31 people have been killed and several hundred are still unaccounted for.
The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection's (CAL FIRE) latest update reports that the Camp Fire has burned about 111,000 acres and is only 25 percent contained, destroying an estimated 6,453 residences and 260 commercial buildings, making it the most destructive fire in California state history.
The Woolsey Fire in LA and Ventura counties has grown to 85,500 acres and is only 15 percent contained, destroying 177 structures, and prompting evacuations in the affluent community of Malibu.
The current fires' losses are probably below the total losses caused by multiple October 2017 Northern California wildfires that collectively burned over 245,000 acres of land and destroyed more than 8,900 structures, Shields said.
“At this still very preliminary point, we assume that primary insurers rather than reinsurers will bear the majority of losses incurred, although we expect reinsurers to have some exposure, including aggregate covers reflecting year to date (YTD) catastrophe losses,” Shields said.
Bigger reinsurers will retain a much larger share of the losses than for example Kemper and Mercury General, according to KBW. Despite Kemper and Mercury General's relatively high exposure, their low per-event reinsurance retentions of $50 million and $10 million, respectively, should limit their net losses, Shields explained. Similarly, AIG and Chubb could have significant exposure to affluent areas like Malibu which is in the way of the Woolsey Fire, within their High Net Worth homeowners' books, but reinsurance should also temper their net exposure, he noted. To the extent that companies have catastrophe and/or aggregate reinsurance protection, their net losses will be below their gross losses, Shields explained.
Get all the latest re/insurance industry news with our daily newsletter - sign up here.
More of today's news
AmTrust reduces loss from operations in Q3
Markel gets green light for UK branch
IGI creates chief technology role in digital strategy
Capsicum Re bolsters London P&C, cyber team with new hires
Canopius swoops for energy leader from Beazley
Brit CFO appointed chair of LMA finance committee
Already registered?
Login to your account
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Elliot Field at efield@newtonmedia.co.uk or Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk
Editor's picks
Editor's picks
More articles
Copyright © intelligentinsurer.com 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze