shutterstock_640324195_shutter_o
Shutterstock/shutter_o
16 September 2019Insurance

IFRS 17 still beset by some uncertainties, says AM Best

Ratings agency AM Best has highlighted concerns about further amendments being proposed to the International Accounting Standard, IFRS 17, which seeks to reflect market values in the published financial statements of insurers.

IFRS 17 had been due to be implemented at the beginning of 2021, but the date was put back to January 1, 2022, after lobbying from the industry. The standard requires insurers to record more information.

Analysts currently have to adjust insurance companies’ financial positions and performance to be able to compare them, said commentators. IFRS 17 increases transparency about profitability and will add comparability. The main effects are on the allocation of profits to different periods, rather than the total profit earned.

The issues being debated were re-opened to consider limited changes in November 2018. Stakeholders now have until September 25 to respond to the June 2019 Exposure Draft “Amendments to IFRS 17”, in which the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) published its proposals.

AM Best has pointed out “some uncertainties that remain untackled by the amendments”.

The agency noted that although the IASB's proposed changes do not modify the nature of IFRS 17, some would have quite material effects.

One term that is central to the discussion on IFRS 17 is the Contractual Service Margin (CSM), which has been defined as an estimate the profitability that the entity expects the contract to generate over the coverage period

AM Best’s concerns include issues related to the spreading of acquisition costs over expected renewals, attributing CSM to - and amortising it over - the provision of investment return service. AM Best also noted the discussion regarding the matching of losses on onerous underlying contracts with reinsurance recoveries.

As losses on onerous contracts are taken in full when the contracts are identified as onerous, the intention is that corresponding reinsurance recoveries should also be taken at the same time rather than being spread over the term of the reinsurance policy. Without this change, the standard has the effect that the profit from relevant reinsurance, if accounted under the Building Block Approach ( a methodology set out under IFRS 17), would be spread over a period of years using the CSM.

AM Best said that there would be conceptual difficulties in allocating the proceeds from many excess of loss policies, which may reference quite broad portfolios, to the groups of policies used in IFRS 17.

Get all the latest re/insurance industry news with our daily newsletter -  sign up here.

Typhoon Faxai to cost re/insurers up to $7bn, finds cat modeller

Marsh JLT, Willis Re partner with insurtech Concirrus on 'revolutionary' marine cargo solution

RSA reshuffles Ireland and Scandinavian leadership in growth push

JBA's new 'probabilistic' model to tackle flood coverage gaps

Lloyd's insurer Neon reveals leadership changes as CEO steps down

DXC appoints new CEO to lead next phase of growth

Feature:  10 ways insurers are using insurtech to drive new business

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Elliot Field at efield@newtonmedia.co.uk or Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Insurance
27 September 2019   Ratings agency AM Best has revised the outlook of specialty insurance company ProAssurance Corporation to negative from stable, expressing concern over its operating performance in recent years.
Insurance
23 September 2019   Sentiment on the Turkish insurance market has become less optimistic in recent times, as it has generated poor underwriting performance for most market participants.
Insurance
11 September 2019   With a lack of global players, the Bolivian insurance market differs greatly from that of Brazil, where local reinsurers must compete against each other and large companies with a wide array of offerings. AM Best speaks to FIDES Today.